India insists Pak refused to accept advance message

November 21, 2012 02:24 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:35 am IST - ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI

In its first reaction to the hanging of Ajmal Kasab — the lone gunman nabbed alive after the Mumbai terror attacks of November 2008 — Pakistan contested claims by Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid that Islamabad had refused to accept the government of India’s advance communication on the execution.

In a statement released to the Associated Press of Pakistan on Wednesday, Foreign Office spokesman Moazzam Khan said the Indian Deputy High Commissioner handed over the note on the execution to the Director General South (DGSA) Asia on Tuesday evening in person. “The DGSA received that note and acknowledged the receipt.”

Earlier, media reports from India quoted Mr. Shinde as stating: “The External Affairs Ministry through our mission in Islamabad had informed the Pakistan government about Kasab’s hanging. When they did not accept the letter, they were communicated through fax.”

According to Mr. Khan, these reports were incorrect and baseless. He added Pakistan’s position on terrorism was very clear and consistent, and it always condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. “We are willing to cooperate and work closely with all countries of the region to eliminate the scourge of terrorism.”

But government sources in New Delhi insisted that the Indian Deputy High Commissioner had met his counterpart in the Pakistan Foreign Office on Tuesday, a day before the execution, to hand over the communication from the Maharashtra government to Kasab’s family informing it of the completion of the legal process and the date of his hanging. But the official refused to accept the communication, following which it was faxed from the Indian High Commission to the official and a transmission report received.

As of now, the Indian High Commission has not received any “acknowledgement” from Pakistan's Foreign Ministry to that fax, said the sources.

“Therefore, our obligation to inform them adequately was fulfilled. We also had in our possession a particular address given by Kasab and we did convey to that address as well the decision that had been taken,’’ said Mr. Khurshid.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.