Centre gets a Rs. 25-cr. bill on MPs’ hotel stay

‘Centre will foot the bills of only genuine cases, others will have to pay out of their pockets’

March 27, 2015 02:29 am | Updated 02:29 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The government has run up a bill of Rs. 25 crore on the hotel stay of Lok Sabha members in the capital since the May 2014 general elections. Of the 350 MPs given temporary accommodation in ITDC hotels, over 50 continue to stay there despite being allotted other accommodation.

The Lok Sabha Secretariat has been spending close to Rs. 7.5 lakh a day on hotel bills, prompting the Urban Development Ministry to write to the Finance Ministry to part with more funds to pay off the dues.

On Wednesday, The Hindu had reported that the Lok Sabha Secretariat has asked MPs who continue to live in hotels to pay their bills on their own or move to the accommodation allocated to them.

Since the Urban Development Ministry is short of funds, the Finance Ministry has been asked to allocate more money under non-Plan expenditure. “The Secretariat had earlier asked the MPs to move to the government accommodation and recently a letter seeking an explanation from them was sent. The Centre has made it clear that the bills will be paid only for those MPs who have a genuine reason to live out of the hotels, while others have been asked to pay out of their pockets,” a senior official said.

Another official said the MPs checked into hotels only when they were in the capital during Parliament sessions or for official work, but the rooms remained booked in their names.

“It is for this reason [to avoid paying hotel bills] that the NDA government relentlessly began pursuing overstaying former MPs and Ministers to vacate the government accommodation so that the fresh lot has a place to stay,” the official said.

On Thursday, former Union Minister Jagdish Tytler vacated the 3 Gurdwara Rakabganj house where he had been living in for six years.

Mr. Tytler was allotted the house in his capacity as a Lok Sabha member in 2009 and had managed to retain it after getting the nod from the UPA government on account of being a “high risk protectee.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.