ICHR debate on Aryan invasion theory cut short

March 28, 2015 03:23 am | Updated November 16, 2021 05:12 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

An effort by Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) member-secretary Gopinath Ravindran to advocate the coexistence of all schools of history to keep alive the idea of a plural India during the Foundation Day lecture by American Vedic teacher David Frawley here on Friday, was cut short by some members of the gathering.

In his lecture, Dr. Frawley questioned the Aryan invasion theory and was also critical of India for not extensively teaching ancient India to its students.

“Few Indians today seem to know or take pride in their historical heritage that is one of the oldest in the world. …we find some Indian academics denigrating their own traditions, from a superficial view that does not adequately understand the background or purpose of the older teachings.”

As Prof. Ravindran questioned some of Dr. Frawley’s contentions, particularly his insistence that there was no Aryan invasion as made out by “colonial and Marxist historians,” some back-benchers in the audience protested and told the member-secretary to wrap up his address.

Referring to the Marxist school of history, Dr. Frawley said: “We are in a post-colonial/post-Marxist era because of the failure of Marxism the world over’’ and added that there was still quite a lot of it in India.

‘No one view’

In an oblique reference to this criticism of the Marxist school of history, Prof. Ravindran, before contesting Dr. Frawley’s argument on the Aryan invasion theory, said: “There is no one view of history. It is not a question of just taking the red out.’’ Arguing that all schools of history should coexist, he added: “It is important to safeguard the idea of India as a plural India. Disagreement is healthy but we should allow all strands of thought.’’

As members in the audience cut the member-secretary short, ICHR Chairman Y. Sudershan Rao stepped in to support Dr. Frawley’s contention, stating that the Aryan invasion theory is made up and not backed by archaeological evidence.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.