No more ‘droughts’ in India, says IMD

Move is part of decision to re-define terms that are not scientifically precise.

January 12, 2016 01:51 am | Updated December 16, 2016 10:52 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY:  Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. NICAID:111676889 TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY:  Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. - TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY:  Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. NICAID:111676889

TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY: Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. NICAID:111676889 TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY: Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. - TUTICORIN:04/10/2009: FOR DAILY: Longing for rain: A Korampallam tank dry in Tuticorin on Sunday. Photo N_Rajesh. NICAID:111676889

The India Meteorological Department (IMD) has officially expunged the word “drought” from its vocabulary, months after it struck a contrarian note and correctly forecast one of India’s severest monsoon deficits last year.

According to a circular issued by the department last Thursday, the move is part of a decision to do away with or re-define terms that are not scientifically precise. Beginning this season, for instance, if India’s monsoon rainfall were to dip below 10 per cent of the normal and span between 20 and 40 per cent of the country’s area, it would be called a “deficient” year instead of an “All India Drought Year” as the IMD’s older manuals would say. A more severe instance, where the deficit exceeds 40 per cent and would have been called an “All India Severe Drought Year,” will now be a “Large Deficient Year”.

The IMD has never used the term “drought” in its forecasts and has maintained that declaring droughts was the prerogative of States. “Some confusion has been there over some years,” said B.P. Yadav, spokesperson for the agency, “and we wanted to be more precise.”

The agency had several definitions of drought: meteorological, hydrological and agricultural, and it was quite possible for a State to have a meteorological drought — 90 per cent shortfall of the average monsoon rainfall — but not suffer an agricultural drought —if the shortfall didn’t affect more than 20 per cent of the State’s area. “Declaring a drought has never been the IMD’s mandate and, in fact, not even that of the Central government,” said Shailesh Nayak, former Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences, to whom the IMD reports. “That’s because drought is not a measure of productivity (agricultural).”

Officials said the change in the nomenclature would not practically influence the way States viewed droughts.

The spokesperson for the agency said there would now be a standardised definition for heat waves and cold waves, and the IMD’s local arms would no longer use terms such as “could” or “may” to suggest the possibility of showers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.