Director of Prosecution to face trial, says Goa CBI court

September 06, 2014 07:22 pm | Updated 07:22 pm IST - PANAJI

The Goa CBI Court on Saturday directed former Goa Director of Prosecution Shobha Dhumaskar to face trial on corruption charges under Section 13(2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) (i) & (ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 while rejecting the plea by the State Anti – Corruption branch (ACB) to close the case against her.

Judge P. V. Sawaikar allowed an application filed by activist lawyer Aires Rodrigues opposing the move by the ACB to close the corruption case that was registered against Ms. Dhumaskar.

While seeking to close the case, the ACB had informed the court that though the corruption case was true, the evidence was weak to chargesheet Ms. Dhumaskar as the loss to the exchequer was only Rs.61,200 and that the amount was being recovered.

Opposing the move, Mr. Rodrigues had drawn the attention of the CBI Court that Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar had on May 7 last year by a written order approved the closure of the corruption case against Ms. Dhumaskar, which, he said, was to reward her for having issued a circular on May 29, 2012 directing all Public Prosecutors and Assistant Public Prosecutors to withdraw all criminal cases against politicians.

He also recalled that despite an F.I.R being registered against her, the Goa Government instead of suspending her gave her two extensions in service along with a very hefty pay hike.

On August 5, 2011, the activist had filed a complaint with the ACB against Ms. Dhumaskar alleging her of corruption and causing loss to the State exchequer.

He had drawn the attention of the ACB that a 76 sq mts flat at ‘Mutual Apartments’, at Panaji was leased by the then Director of Prosecution Dhumaskar in a manner showing undue favouritism and causing loss to the State exchequer.

He had pointed out that Ms. Dhumaskar went out of the way to lease that flat without issuing a public advertisement and that she had permitted the owners of the flat undue financial advantage at the cost of the State exchequer and had intentionally caused a huge financial loss to the State Exchequer.

As the ACB declined to register the F.I.R against her the complainant moved the Special Court under the Prevention of corruption Act which on April 21, 2012, which directed that an F.I.R. be registered against Ms. Dhumaskar.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.