BCCI and a credibility deficit

April 24, 2014 01:49 am | Updated November 17, 2021 01:08 am IST

Once again, the credibility deficit of the Board of Control for Cricket in India stands underlined. A three-member committee recommended by the BCCI to hold an investigation into charges concerning the Indian Premier League matches last year has not found favour with the Supreme Court. Instead, the Court has, in a welcome move, chosen to request Justice Mukul Mudgal, who headed a Court-appointed panel that came out with an insightful report earlier, to hold a full-fledged investigation. The probe will cover allegations contained in a sealed cover against 12 persons, including some cricketers, besides N. Srinivasan, related to the IPL spot-fixing and betting scandal. It has suggested that Mr. Justice Mudgal could also take the assistance of investigative agencies. Going by the manner in which the Board responded to the Court’s suggestion at an earlier hearing that it should spell out how it proposed to conduct an internal inquiry, it is clear that the cricket body is more worried about the fallout of a probe than getting at the truth. When the Supreme Court itself was against any police agency probing the matter — so that the players’ reputation and the Board’s autonomy were not undermined — all it had to do was come up with a panel comprising members with no obvious conflict of interest. Yet, what the Board proposed was a committee comprising a former CBI Director with some connection to a team in the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association league, a retired Calcutta High Court Chief Justice related to the court-appointed BCCI president Shivlal Yadav, and a former cricketer with a lucrative commentating contract with the Board.

While all of them — former CBI director R.K. Raghavan, Justice J.N. Patel and Ravi Shastri — are individuals of undoubted personal integrity, experience and understanding of the issues involved, the BCCI could not have lost sight of the need for an investigation of some of the leading personalities in Indian cricket to appear to be fair and free of any conflict of interest or connection with the BCCI. There can only be one explanation for the Board not coming up with a plan for a credible investigation by a completely independent panel: it does not want a fair inquiry even if in the process its credibility takes a beating. It reveals an unwillingness to shed its image as an opaque clique. What cricket fans and the public need now is reassurance that the glamorous flagship tournament of the BCCI is not yielding illegal spin-off benefits to punters, bookies, fixers and assorted operators seeking to capitalise on the popularity of the sport. Apart from a thorough clean-up of the game, the Indian cricket board needs to win back the trust of the game’s fans, and the public at large.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.