Helmet rule

July 03, 2015 01:44 am | Updated 01:44 am IST

During the last 40 years, I have personally managed at least 25,000 cases of head injuries, 90 per cent of which were the result of two-wheeler accidents; 95 per cent of fatalities were in those not wearing helmets. There are also survivors who have either a mild, moderate or severe brain injury. They often have a residual disability. In 1966, when I was in class 11, my elder brother died in a two-wheeler accident. He was not wearing a helmet. In 1972, when studying medicine, my eldest brother met with a fatal road accident. He too was not wearing a helmet. In 2007, I appeared before the High Court of Madras — W.P. No.19587 of 1999 in a PIL and produced unequivocal scientific evidence that wearing a quality helmet is the easiest way of significantly reducing mortality and morbidity. It is my sincere prayer that other States follow Tamil Nadu’s lead in enforcing the ‘wear helmet’ rule (some editions, July 2).

Prof. K. Ganapathy,Chennai

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.