The final step

A look at the theme of the previous 10 finals.   

March 29, 2015 03:46 am | Updated March 24, 2016 10:27 am IST

A World Cup final can never be dismissed as just another game. It is the ultimate test of a player’s — and a team’s — character. Though the Cup is just a step away, it could become a steep climb if nerves take over. A look at the theme of the previous 10 finals.

Time for the toss

Captains winning the spin of coin have lost six of the 10 finals. Allan Border was the first skipper to get both right (1987), while Arjuna Ranatunga is the only one who has been successful after opting to chase (1996).

In England, all four editions (’75, 79, 83 & 99) saw the captain get it wrong after calling it right. However, in Australia and New Zealand in 1992, Pakistan skipper Imran Khan emerged winner on both counts.

The big question: bat or bowl?

Given the high stakes and pressure associated with a final, it’s commonly felt that setting a target is better than pursuing one. To vindicate this, seven of the 10 matches have gone in favour of the target-setter.

Ranatunga (’96), Steve Waugh (’99) and M.S. Dhoni (2011) are the only skippers to win batting second.

There’s a common thread to the chases: all three were sealed with a boundary. While Ranatunga and Darren Lehmann finished the task with a four, Dhoni went one better, smashing a six. The captains had the honour of hitting the winning runs in two of them (Ranatunga, Dhoni).

Tough call

In a cup final, captains can be forgiven for thinking that they could have scored more (batting first), or saved more (batting second). For, there is no clear-cut answer to the question: how much does a side need?

The mighty West Indies ran up huge totals (291 & 286) during its triumphs in ’75 and ’79, but couldn’t even chase India’s 183 in the next one!

India holds the twin honour of defending the smallest total (183 vs WI, 1983) as well as pulling off the biggest chase (277 vs SL, 2011) in finals. It also has the dubious distinction of conceding the highest runs — 359 to Ponting’s Australia, 2003.

Adam blows away opening blues

Before Gilchrist took guard in the 2007 final, no opener had scored a hundred in the summit clash. He changed all that with a typically, aggressive 149 against the hapless Sri Lankans. His score remains the highest in a World Cup final; it is still the only century by an opening batsman.

Extras

The first-ever dismissal in a World Cup final happened to be a hit-wicket, West Indies’s Roy Fredericks falling to Australia’s Dennis Lillee.

Gary Gilmour’s five-wicket haul went in vain for the Aussies in the 1975 final. The only other five-for came in the subsequent edition, when Joel Garner bowled West Indies to a thumping win over England.

With the bowlers at sixes and sevens, India employed eight of them in the 2003 final, a dubious record. Only two — Javagal Srinath and Aashish Nehra — finished their quotas.

Aravinda de Silva (’96) is the only player to score a century for a side chasing a target, while Mahela Jayawardene (2011) is the only batsman to end up on the losing side despite scoring a century.

Though the West Indians couldn’t complete a hat-trick at Lord’s, umpire Dickie Bird did, standing in the first three finals. Steve Bucknor broke Bird’s record, officiating in five successive finals (’92 to ’07).

Kapil Dev and Joel Garner share the record for the most maidens bowled in a final — 4. Both happened in the 1983 finale.

In the 1992 final, a bye-runner was seen in action in both innings: Aamer Sohail doubled up for Javed Miandad while Alec Stewart stepped up for Neil Fairbrother.

A rare combo: Ponting’s whirlwind knock of 140* against India in the 2003 final contained eight sixes but just four fours!

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.